Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« Civilization | Main | Free-Floating Voting »


Missing from Juan Williams/NPR Debate: O’Reilly and 'The ACORN Deal'

By John Atlas
October 26, 2010

A raging debate has ensued around whether NPR correctly fired Juan Williams because his remarks were inconsistent with editorial. Some say Williams undermined his credibility as a news analyst. Others accuse NPR of bungling its response and stifling free speech. What’s been missing in the debate over his firing is this.

Immediately after National Public Radio fired Williams because of his remarks about Muslims, Fox Cable’s Bill O’Reilly said, “This is like the ACORN deal — no more money to NPR. NPR has now devolved into a totalitarian outfit functioning as an arm of the far left.”

The Republican leadership and the right wing echo chamber followed O’Reilly’s call for the federal defunding of National Public Radio. Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., announced plans to introduce legislation to strip federal funds from NPR because it fired Williams. According to DeMint, NPR received $4 billion in federal money since 2001 and will get $430 million in the 2011. Republican Minority Whip Eric Cantor and nearly every Republican running for office this year promised to seek an end to taxpayer subsidies for NPR and public television.

ACORN, the anti-poverty community group, destroyed by the Republican Party and its communications department, Fox News, has become today’s symbol for the collective punishment for groups conservatives consider America’s evil wrong doers.

Republicans demonized ACORN, and see NPR, as a political threat: ACORN because of its effective grassroots organizing and voter registration; NPR because of its even-handed coverage of politics, which sometimes challenges conservative orthodoxy.

The principle behind “The ACORN deal” is if an individual from a group (ACORN or NPR) makes a mistake, and the group does not adhere to a conservative philosophy of unfettered free markets and Christian fundamentalism, then the entire organization must be punished. In 2009, the U.S. Congress defunded ACORN, after a barrage of false accusations led to its destruction. ACORN, whose members are mostly African-American, which for four decades was America’s most effective anti-poverty group, should never have been destroyed.

Moreover, the Republican's call for defunding ACORN and NPR is hypocritical since the GOP and Fox News don’t apply the same standards to the misdeeds and even crimes committed by businesses or groups that conforms to free market and Christian fundamentalism, and enjoy government support.

For nearly 40 years, ACORN, had been mobilizing low-income Americans to fight for social justice, challenging powerful banks, corporations, and government officials around such issues as wages for the working poor, predatory lending and foreclosures, welfare reform, public education, affordable housing, and voting rights. And then suddenly, in less than two years after its former ally Barack Obama got elected, in one of the most bizarre incidents in recent political history, it was destroyed by a ferocious attack by the right wing of the Republican Party, its allies, and Fox News.

Although it was exonerated of all charges of wrong doing by six independent investigations including two Congressional investigations, the Brooklyn DA and the California Attorney General, ACORN had to dissolve because its name had been defamed.

Ironically it was NPR along with the New York Times and other mainstream media that helped destroy ACORN by repeating the voter registration fraud and other accusations against the group, failing to give adequate coverage of ACORN’s forty years of good work, and by virtually ignoring the investigations that exonerated the group of any wrong doing. According to a study by Peter Dreier and Christopher Martin during October 2008, a time when very few people ever heard of ACORN, 72.2% of NPR’s stories had the voter fraud frame, while most of the stories gave at best a cursory background of ACORN’s work of empowering the working poor.

After Congress defunded ACORN in 2009, Senator Bernie Sanders pointed out that Congress had lavishly funded many corporations that unlike ACORN actually committed felonies.

For example, just two weeks before the Senate action, on September 2, drug company giant Pfizer had been hit with the biggest criminal fine in U.S. history as part of a $2.3 billion settlement with federal prosecutors for illegally promoting medicines and for paying kickbacks to doctors. The company was paying $1 billion in civil settlements for Medicare and Medicaid fraud. protest4.gif

According to fedspending.org, in 2007 Pfizer had more than $73 million in federal contracts. Blackwater, a company that had five of its employees facing murder charges in a massacre of Iraqi civilians in 2007, had received a $217 million contract to provide security in Iraq. A former Halliburton subsidiary, KBR, had received $80 million in contract bonuses to provide electrical wiring in Iraq, which electrocuted sixteen soldiers and two contractors. Northrop Grumman had to pay a $500 million fine for getting caught nine times committing contract fraud. The Congress that defunded ACORN had also bailed out Goldman Sachs, AIG, J. P. Morgan, and other financial services corporations that lacked transparency, committed unethical or illegal acts, and engaged in practices that led to the crash of our financial system. The political attacks on ACORN revealed an obvious double standard. How else to explain why Republicans and the right insisted on defunding ACORN for its errors but failed to seek the same treatment for chronic corporate lawbreakers that receive billions in federal dollars?

The hypocrisy was striking.

So here’s the ACORN rule: no collective punishment for the rich and powerful ideologically correct conservatives. For them, the punishment is tailored to fit the crime. They pay a fine, plead guilty to a misdemeanor other minor offense and go on to reap millions in federal funds. For the groups who are part of the “ACORN deal,” that is the politically incorrect, we must defund and destroy them.

Editors' Note: John Atlas is the author of the new book Seeds of Change: The Story of ACORN, America's Most Controversial Antipoverty Community Organizing Group, available at Amazon. and other book stores.


Comments (3)

Ken Poland Author Profile Page:

Big government and regulations are fine, if the heavy hand is directed by the compassionate conservative religious right

James Bordonaro Author Profile Page:

While I agree that companies that defraud the government should be prohibit from future bidding on government contracts and we ought to be employing more criminal prosecutions of corporate directors, I wouldn't place the entire blame for ACORN's demise on the Conservative movement. I had a very limited insight into the workings of a single local ACORN office in Tallahassee, Florida way back in 2004 and my perception was that it was a very poorly managed organization where the workers often failed to show up for work and also lacked much insight into the political process. So, to me, it's no surprise that ACORN folded after the despicable video "hit job" by Mr. O'Keefe and the equally disgusting rush to judgment of members of Congress and the media (mostly Republicans and Fox News to be sure)of the veracity of the videotapes.

As for Juan, I don't think a firing was deserved but I find him to be whining about the whole affair and can't generate much sympathy for a guy who's just signed a contract for $2 million. Juan's rarely been very thoughtful in his viewpoints and the faux outrage by the same idiots as before only speaks to their shallowness.

Diane Author Profile Page:

I hated listening to Juan Williams on NPR, but I think the head honchos made a mistake in firing him. He may have deserved it, but it gave conservatives more ammunition to go after centrist and liberal institutions. Besides, if you listen to his comments in context, he did modify his statement to indicate that he knew he was being irrational about the situation.

I'm a sustaining member of my two local NPR affiliates and I will continue to be, but I've noticed recently that the NPR gives a whole lot more coverage to the small minority of Tea Partiers than it does to Democrats or anyone on the left. I know NPR attempts to be even-handed, but I've sure seen a lot of slippage in that recently.

Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on October 26, 2010 5:49 PM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "Civilization"

The post that follows this one is titled "Free-Floating Voting"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

© Copyright, 2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.