Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« Science, Religion, Morality | Main | Film Review - To End All Wars »


Our Secular Constitution: Thank God

By Bob Hooper
August 12, 2010

In the last two columns, I have risked irritating any I may have missed, by tangling with American perceptions and practices of Christianity. One internet reader said I had missed the point:

"This nation was and is founded on fundmental chrisian [sic] beliefs and ideals. The facts [Mr. Hooper] lays out that what is seen in behavior is different than the ideal......well that is the nature of the world. We all, including the writer, voice and truely [sic] believe in ideals, but our nature is to fall vicitim [sic] to our base drives and narcissistic deceptions."
Yes, the species "homo religious" commonly have ideals they fail to honor. Then again, some part of that same species routinely claim ideals they neither have nor intend to acquire--since merely claiming them improves their political prospects, fattens their wallets, or both. But the other assertion, that this is a Christian nation, is especially popular today with Christian dominionists. And it is wrong.

Our founding document is the Constitution. It is designedly and intentionally secular. It is godless -- not in the sense that it is anti-Christian, or anti-religion, but that it is wisely neutral.

We Americans are free to be as religious or agnostic or atheist as our individual consciences dictate. None of our varied positions on the supernatural is to be favored by government. At least, that's how it stands today. The Christian right wants it changed. That debate is both contemporary and historical. It is perpetual and it is important. Thus far, thank God, theocrats have lost.

The Articles of Confederation refer to The Great Governor of the World. (Sec. XIII) The congress of that time actively promoted a kind of non-denominational Christianity. It proclaimed a national day of prayer, and sponsored the publication of a Bible. That congress also honored a theology which said that God granted this country favored status in a kind of contractual arrangement. New England Puritans especially liked it.

As our Constitution was being written, 11 of the 13 colonies incorporated religious language in their founding documents. Only New York and Virginia did not. Of course, most allowed only Protestants to hold office. Many feared that Roman Catholics would be more loyal to the Pope (a prejudice that re-surfaced in the election of John Kennedy). Jews were banned from office in Pennsylvania, along with Quakers, Mennonites, and Moravians. Moravians, incidentally, were the first to establish missions to the slaves. New York's colonial government expelled them in 1744. In Delaware, sworn belief in the Trinity was required.

The men who wrote our Constitution knew all too well the history of religious bias empowered by government -- in this country and abroad, recently and historically -- not merely division but sickening horror.
[Photo of an "ear-nailing" courtesy
of the The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
www.history.org/foundation/journal]

Few humans or institutions are potentially more dangerous than those cocksure they know all about a supernatural God ... or are able to convince others they do. And, my opinion is that the ugly potential not only remains today, but is gathering venom.

Yes, three-quarters of Americans now claim to be Christians. Depending on the definition and standards, some undoubtedly are. But whatever the evidence (or lack of it) to convict that same 75 percent as Christians, another 25 pct. make no such claim -- and are equally Americans, Constitutionally free to practice (or claim to practice) any religion or none -- so long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others.

The claim is often made that the Constitution is a Christian document and derives from the Judeo-Christian Bible, but seldom is any specific evidence delivered (or even requested). Where is the Biblical basis or argument for a democratic republic, separation of powers, checks and balances, a two-chamber legislature, the bill of rights with all the guarantees of liberties and protections -- like a trial by a jury of peers; freedom of press, speech and assembly? And, yes, freedom of and from religion? Indeed, what moral or civic values in our Constitution are exclusively representative of Christianity? Chapter and verse, please.

Of the 55 representatives who took part in writing our Constitution and the 39 who signed, all have been assigned some religious affiliation or other. Had they wished, they might very easily have inserted Christian language and prescriptions into the document. They deliberately did not. Even though there were precedents in colonial constitutions and in the Articles of Confederation, those precedents were deliberately rejected.

Charles Pinckney of South Carolina proposed inserting in Article 6, Section 3, the words "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." His proposal was adopted with little discussion. James Madison, who would follow Thomas Jefferson as President, afterward wrote in the first line of the very first amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."

There were, of course, passionate objections, widely debated during the ratification process. All those efforts to Christianize or even modestly religify our Constitution failed. A last ditch effort was made with the Virginia Initiative in the Spring of 1788, which proposed Article 6 be revised to read "no other religious test shall ever be required than a belief in the one only true God, who is the rewarder of the good, and the punisher of the evil." Even that failed.

Thank God.


Comments (1)

Angelo Lopez Author Profile Page:

Thank God indeed. I think the attempts by the Religious Right to gradually take control of our culture are dangerous, and one of the most insidious attempts is their attempts to make the Constitution something that it is not. This essay is a good defense of the secular nature of the document.

Here is a quote you might like. Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Notes On Virginia:

"Difference of opinion is advantageous in religion. The several sects perform the office of censor morum over each other. Is uniformity attainable? Millions of innocent men, women, and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burned, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch toward uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the earth. Let us reflect that it is inhabited by a thousand different systems of religion; that ours is but one of that thousand; that if there be but one right, and ours that one, we should wish to see the nine hundred and ninety-nine wandering sects gathered into the fold of truth. But against such a majority we cannot effect this by force. Reason and persuasion are the only practicable instruments. To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged; and how can we wish others to indulge it while we refuse it ourselves?"

Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on August 12, 2010 6:51 PM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "Science, Religion, Morality"

The post that follows this one is titled "Film Review - To End All Wars"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.