Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« Counterproductive to Lay Off Hundreds of Public Sector Employees | Main | National Resolution Calls for Ending School Pushout »


Women Discriminated Against, Charged More for Health Care

By Pamela Jean
December 4, 2009

If it becomes law, the bill currently passed today in the U.S. House would end the practice of setting premiums higher for females and denying coverage to women simply because of their gender.

Today, too many women in the U.S. depend on a health care system that is failing them.

According to a 2008 report by the National Women's Law Center, typical 25-year-old women paid between 6% and 45% more than 25-year-old men for the same insurance market or health plans. Older women faced similar, and often even greater disparities.

Women will continue to be denied maternity coverage or charged significantly higher premiums than men in the health insurance market until Congress adopts a national health system reform bill, like the current bill in the U.S. House.

Even women with health insurance report problems affording health care. Unaffordable cost-sharing requirements, annual limits on covered services, or health plan limits on lifetime expenditures have a disproportionate impact on women. They are more likely than men to be underinsured, meaning they have coverage that leaves their financial and physical health at risk.

Due to all of these factors, when women are unable to obtain or afford health plans that cover a comprehensive set of health benefits, these same women struggle to pay out-of-pocket for necessary health care services that are not covered by their plans.

As a result, insured women not only often delay getting the services they require in order to remain healthy, but they may have to skip important care when they need it the most, even when ill.

Here's the irony - these same women are paying for their health care insurance. These women, who do buy insurance policies, although they "technically" have insurance, still find themselves compelled to often avoid seeking medical services altogether. Their higher priced and fully paid insurance plans go unused.

They cannot afford to use what they have purchased because what they purchased was priced so high it left them with no discretionary cash with which to pay co-pays and deductibles. Then, to add insult to injury, the woman are usually paying a great deal more than their male peers.

Women get punished by this sort of discrimination both "coming and going." How?

Women have more trouble affording necessary health care - not just because they are charged more - but also because they are paid less.

Women are generally poorer than men, earning just 78 cents for every dollar men earn. Yet, women also use the health care system more, in part due to their reproductive health needs (pdf). Because they are poorer and, on the average have higher deductible plans, women spend a greater share of their income on their health needs. Women are more likely than men to struggle with medical bills or debt, and to report cost-related problems with accessing health care.

In the absence of health reform, more and more women and families will lose their health insurance. National experts have predicted that at least 6.9 million more Americans will lose their health coverage by the end of 2010 (pdf). If we do nothing, family premiums will continue to skyrocket, reaching a projected $24,000 per year for average American families by 2016.

Women literally cannot afford the status quo. Woman's well-being - and that of her family - depend on health reform that meets her needs.

Women are among those who stand to gain the most from national health insurance reform. Women pay more and women get less. How can this even be legal? Why have we allowed this? Why have we waited so long to notice that our mothers and daughters are disproportionately served by a discriminatory health care system?

It's time that the insurance companies be stopped from jacking up health insurance premiums for women. It's time to end this discrimination of our sisters, daughters, mothers and our grandmothers.

Please note: If it becomes law, the bill currently passed today in the U.S. House, submitted by the House Democrats and headed now to conference with the Senate, will indeed end the discrimination of women.

We can put an end to this tragic discrimination, once and for all. Say "Yes!" to health care for all Americans. Show your support for the Democratic House Bill, H.R. 3961.

The American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have published positions opposing gender rating, like that which this new bill will eliminate.


Comments (2)

mtuckey Author Profile Page:

Thanks Pam for writing about this angle. I wonder too how many policies actually cover birth control (compared to how many cover viagra).

Jeff Mincey Author Profile Page:

Pamela, a very important issue and I thank you for shining a light on it here. It's actually hard to find an area of the economy in which women don't suffer an inequity.

For example, women who seek to buy a car will generally be quoted a price higher than what a man will be quoted. Women's apparel is much more costly than men's, and women also continue to suffer unequal wages (as you note in your article above).

On NPR today it was suggested this is attributable to women's lack of negotiating skills (as a class) compared to that of men. In salary negotiations, for instance, women are more likely to sell themselves short and start with a low figure that will curse them throughout their career — or so goes this school of thought.

You gotta love it. Nice and tidy — it's still the woman's fault. You women just don't drive a hard bargain the way we men do.

Never let it be said that it should be incumbent on an employer to pay a fair and non-discriminatory salary to start with — horrors! We can have none of that.

But the coup de grace is indeed health care. Women may be more frequent consumers of clinics and hospitals, but then they are likewise more likely to catch illness in early stages and ultimately to incur lower costs in the long run. (I can cite no data to support this, but it stands to reason that preventive care will pay dividends down the road.)

Thanks again for this excellent piece on a subject of vital importance.

Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on December 4, 2009 3:04 PM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "Counterproductive to Lay Off Hundreds of Public Sector Employees"

The post that follows this one is titled "National Resolution Calls for Ending School Pushout"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2009, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.