Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« Young Adults Know Little About Contraception, Yet, Still Participate? | Main | A Church Billboard Questions Christmas Story »


Modernizing TSCA will be a winning proposal for us all

By Jamie Sanderson
December 17, 2009

Thirty-three years ago, Gerald Ford was in the final year of his presidency, a brand new company called Apple was beginning production on the first personal computers, you could buy a cup of coffee for 26 cents and Congress passed a major new law called the Toxic Substances Control Act, or TSCA.

Every single one of those things has changed since 1976. That is, every single one but TSCA.

It is time that we modernize our country’s chemical safety laws so that we can better protect our citizens, our environment, and our industries. An updated TSCA should take into account the significant advances that have been made in the detection and understanding of toxic chemicals in a manner that prioritizes safety, innovation, and jobs.

The beauty of chemical safety reform is that a practical solution will fulfill all three of these priorities—and meet the needs of consumer, labor, environmental, and industry groups alike.

Modernizing TSCA will be a winning proposal for us all.

While public safety must always be the top priority as we facilitate safe chemical production and use, we can also use these vital reforms to create further innovation and family-wage jobs.

Across the country, the chemical industry employs 850,000 people, 21,400 of whom work in the great state of South Carolina. The industry also supports downstream jobs in other industries for millions more workers and injects $700 billion a year into our national economy.

In these difficult economic times, we can use reform to encourage greater innovation that will support and grow tens of thousands of high-paying American jobs—all while updating our chemical safety laws to protect public health and preserve the environmental health of our planet.

As our scientific community begins to recognize the risk that certain chemicals pose to human and environmental health, the chemical industry is already taking proactive measures to create the next generation of safe and environmentally-sensitive materials. These “green chemistry” products will be able to replace their less-green counterparts, spurring jobs and innovation.

The growth of green chemistry will inevitably be associated with new opportunities in research and development and manufacturing, which will also extend to numerous associated industries. The agriculture, transportation, manufacturing, and pharmaceutical industries’ reliance on chemical products means that they, too, will feel a job boon as these new green chemistry products move through the supply chain.

By applying heightened uniform safety standards across the country and compelling companies to innovate with new, modern products, we will see environmentally-sensitive chemicals propelling the industry forward. Already, chemical products help to power solar cell operations, to fuel the batteries that will replace gas tanks in our cars, and to produce highly desirable new technologies like wind power blades and compact fluorescent lights. The possibilities are endless as innovation and job growth continues.

This opportunity for job creation, however, is only possible with a comprehensive and balanced approach to chemical safety reform.

This sensible approach will allow us to modernize our chemical safety laws in a way that supports consumers, workers, and business.

This sensible approach will protect workers, help businesses control costs, and maintain American competitiveness.

Congress must be careful not too impose so many restrictions on chemical production and distribution that it sends companies fleeing to China, where safety restrictions are lax and tainted chemical materials can be shipped to the U.S. and put American citizens at risk.

The Coalition for Chemical Safety, composed of consumer, labor, and industry groups, understands that only a balanced approach to chemical safety can achieve safety, jobs, and innovation.

Unfortunately, TSCA as we know it accomplishes none of these goals.

While the music of Elton John and Paul Simon may be timeless, the chemical regulations of 1976 certainly are not.


Comments (1)

aryenish birdie Author Profile Page:

Thanks Jamie, for posting something about keeping our kids safe. I think making industrial chemicals safe for infants and children is something we can all get behind. To ensure that we really fix this problem we must include modern science language, which necessarily utilizes non-animal methods, in this bill; otherwise we'll have another outdated bill on our hands.

As you state many things about this bill need to be updated. Many toxicity tests are based on experiments in animals and use methods that were developed as long ago as the 1930’s; they and are slow, inaccurate, open to uncertainty and manipulation, and do not adequately protect human health. These tests take anywhere from months to years, and tens of thousands to millions of dollars to perform. More importantly, the current testing paradigm has a poor record in predicting effects in humans and an even poorer record in leading to actual regulation of dangerous chemicals.

Alternatives to animal testing exist in a powerful way and many scientists advocate them. Chemical reform should not only modernize policy, but modernize the science that supports that policy. Let's ensure Kids-Safe uses all the necessary tools to truly make our children, our environment, and animals safe.

Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on December 17, 2009 1:48 PM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "Young Adults Know Little About Contraception, Yet, Still Participate?"

The post that follows this one is titled "A Church Billboard Questions Christmas Story"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.