Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« S.C. Senators Can't Even Vote on Major Spending Bill | Main | American Hunger »


Copenhagen: Clash Between Developing and Developed Countries in Reducing Emission Levels

By Mikyung Lim
December 12, 2009

There appears to be conflict between developing and developed countries at the Copenhagen Climate Summit. The Obama administration and developed nations are trying to make China, India, and other developing countries commit to significant, binding actions of reducing carbon emission as they are expected to be the major polluters of the world (accounting for 97 percent of the future growth in emissions). Developing countries insist that because developed countries caused the current conditions of global warming via their industrial activities throughout history, they have to take more aggressive actions of cutting emissions and provide financial/technical support (i.e., $10 billion per year) of clean energy technologies to developing nations (Reference: Copenhagen Explained: A Game of Double jeopardy).

At this point, I would like to get into an “essential”, potentially useful, side track of experimenting with multilateral negotiations of climate change in conjunction with the mechanism of world trade, “Cooperation of Global Climate and Trade Regimes” ! (at least, it sounds eloquent !) If the current Copenhagen Summit does not deliver desirable agreement of cutting emission levels, what about working with the World Trade Organization (WTO) to further facilitate climate negotiations and obtain developing countries’ (especially China and India) strong commitments to this global cause?

What is the merit of involving WTO in climate talks? Developing countries, such as China and India, have achieved their economic growth that have been mainly fed by exports. Therefore, their need to meet WTO conditions to maintain, secure their favorable trade positions may provide vital negotiation / bargaining leverage in maneuvering climate talks if they are tied to WTO talks. In this way, WTO may provide strong, additional bargaining power to Climate Deals. Does this sound convincing?

I previously talked about the potential WTO effect on Climate negotiations on my Apr 26th, 2009 blog at mybarackobama.com website.


Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on December 12, 2009 4:00 PM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "S.C. Senators Can't Even Vote on Major Spending Bill"

The post that follows this one is titled "American Hunger"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.