Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« Nun Suspends Activism for Abortion Rights After Rebuke | Main | H1N1 Vaccination Hysteria Part 3: Alternative Remedies vs. Vaccination »


Justice of the Peace Refuses to Marry Interracial Couple

By Janet Morrison
November 4, 2009

It's the year 2009. Barack Obama, a bi-racial man, has been elected President of the United States of America. As we look back through our history, we can see the events that led up to him becoming president.

School segregation was outlawed in 1954. Some cities (like Dallas) didn't institute it until 1970. Even now schools suffer from de facto segregation, but at least the de jure segregation is over, I suppose.

In 1967, the Supreme Court determined that interracial marriages were legal. This was another landmark decision. No longer were people told who they could and couldn't love.

Despite this fact, 40+ years later a Justice of the Peace in Louisiana thinks that he doesn't have to abide by that Supreme Court decision. Keith Bardwell refused to marry at least four interracial couples in the last 2 1/2 years.

After much publicity and despite his term being up in 2014, Mr. Bardwell has now decided to resign. Thank goodness.


Comments (2)

Scott Delaney Author Profile Page:

What actually happened was not that he refused to allow them to marry. He made a decision based on his personal experience with interracial couples and interracial children. He himself said that he does not enjoy turning them down, and he in fact refers them to other justices who will marry them. His reasoning behind it was that in his experience, interracial couples and interracial children are outcast from society, and no one accepts them. This is true for the entire country, but think about Louisiana and the rest of the South, which are still heavily white supremacist whether you care to admit it or not. He has friends who are black, and even they admitted that the black community, just like the white community, outcast interracial couples and their children. Based on this, he decided he did not want to be the person to put these families in this situation, so he politely turned them down and referred them to the closest justices who would marry them. He didn't believe that what he was doing was right, but he did not want it on his conscience that these people and their families would be outcast by members of their society for being in love.

When you look at the facts that the news presented, and his interviews, and not just say "he refused to marry them", it makes a lot more sense. He was just looking out for people, but the way you posted it here makes him look like a KKK member who refused to marry them because one person in the couple was black. I can understand if it upsets you, but you shouldn't repost it here in a way that makes him look as if he were some white supremacist. I'm not trying to say what he did was right, but he didn't outright refuse them marriage; he did in fact refer them to people that would marry them. He just didn't want to be the one person that put the couple and their child into that position of being outcast by everyone, which we all know would have happened because, as much as we all hate to admit it, that kind of racism is still out there, especially in the south. What you posted reinforces that, and makes him look like one of those people, when in fact he simply didn't want to be the one to throw the steak into the lion's den.

clyde jr Author Profile Page:

well in my thoughts any person that refuses
to marry pure love is judging a person heart.
it's the same as saying how do you know if
two people are right for each other and there
marriage will make it.if so all the governors
and high office people should have never been
allowed to married seeing that their children
lives would be ruined because of sexuall sin.
some one should have never married them.How many movie stars and their children have become
an outcast to soceity and they are all white
some one should have never married them seeing
the damage to the children.only good and evil
should not be married meaning if a person has a
good heart and loving heart they should not
marry some one who is evil and hateful and
unforgiven.

Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on November 4, 2009 4:03 PM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "Nun Suspends Activism for Abortion Rights After Rebuke"

The post that follows this one is titled "H1N1 Vaccination Hysteria Part 3: Alternative Remedies vs. Vaccination"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.