In her blog, “Will the Unemployment Disaster be Obama’s Katrina?” published on November 23, 2009 at Huffington Post blog, Ms. Adrianna Huffington talks about the need of 2nd Economic Recovery Package for the goal of creating jobs. In the blog, she presents four prevalent ideas of alleviating the current unemployment situations as below:
1. Use Wall Street bailout funds left in the TARP program to bail out Main Street (using money for small businesses, public services).
2. Enact a one-year payroll tax holiday (creating a moratorium on Social Security, Medicare, and FICA taxes will encourage businesses to hire new workers).
3. Expand the Small Business Association's lending programs (45 percent of all job losses have been at small businesses).
4. Offer businesses a tax credit for every new job created over the next 12 months, or have the government pay a portion of the salary of new workers hired over the same period.
From my perspective, I agree Suggestion #1. I think that the government should even require the refund of some portion of the bailout money from “Big Banks” and the return of those banks’ bonuses to their Executives, which were overpaid unjustifiably or through loopholes. These executives failed in their jobs and don’t deserve to be rewarded for their failures; they should not be even called as “Talents” when they actually drove their companies into bankruptcies. What kind of strange definition of “Talents” is this?
Suggestion #2 sounds good, but with side effects. The government needs money to support states or public projects or in case of further need of another recovery package in future, in addition to current huge budget deficits. If the government enacts payroll tax holiday, where will the government make up for its huge (I guess) income loss? As Dr. Krugman suggested, borrow money from other countries at low interest rates?
Suggestions #3 and #4 sound good. But the focal point at this point seems to be “how to stimulate consumer spending / consumption”, which is predicted to be continuously sluggish even in 2010. Without consumer spending starting to resume at their normal rate, helping out with supply, business side alone may have limited effect on job creation.
(Reference: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/will-the-unemployment-dis_b_368329.html).














Comments (2)
Using unused TARP money is a no brainer. I also think that a tax credit to businesses that create American jobs is a good idea. Consumer spending will take care of itself, in my opinion, if there are more people with jobs and that have confidence in the economic recovery. The tax holiday it seems to me is a bad idea.
There needs to be more demand for products and services to get businesses to hire people and a tax holiday won't create much demand for products and services.
Expanding SBA lending seems like a good idea, but it all starts and ends with more people working and having money in their pockets to spend.
Posted by Bruce Fealk
|
November 26, 2009 7:35 AM
Posted on November 26, 2009 07:35
As you mentioned, consumer spending is usually supposed to take care of itself. But in this case, because of low consumer confidence, the prediction is the very sluggish recovery, which makes the recovery of business and employment to normal levels tougher and time consuming.
A week ago or so, according to NPR, the White House already made it clear that "job recovery will be very painful, slow process," which is probably because of almost frozen/very slow recovery of consumer spending. Helping small business may help somewhat to ease the situation. But we may need something very strong stimulation to accelerating things.
Posted by Mikyung Lim
|
November 27, 2009 2:43 PM
Posted on November 27, 2009 14:43