All
of the Everyday Citizen authors
are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often,
leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!
All of our contributing authors
are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of
EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel
free to let us know.
For complete site policies, including privacy, see
our Frequently Asked
Questions. This site is designed,
maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com,
The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and
Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.
Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for
their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our
authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy,
reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the
content reprints include obvious author or website
attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with
this website's Creative Commons
License.
Copyright,
2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise
specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own
individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for
any
otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs
for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for
the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site
are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.
Comments (2)
In their book, "The Monster Under the Bed," authors Stan Davis and Jim Botkin argue that business will increasingly be responsible for the education of our citizens--and that they really have to because the public education sector is failing its citizenry so badly.
While it's an intriguing idea, and one that we promoted when I worked for a business seminar and training company back in the 80s and 90s, there's a potential dark side. And the dark sided has been promoted tirelessly by the far right in their efforts to gut public education and replace it with private education.
My biggest concern in all of these "happy talk" promotions from multinational corporations is that they might be nothing more than thinly-veiled attempts to destroy public efforts. At the very least they're creating legions of "fans" who are purchasers of their products.
There's nothing wrong with business, and I applaud the efforts that Nooyi describes. At the same time I think that these kinds of intrusions into what has been a traditionally public, not-for-profit sphere certainly bear careful watching.
The "Let business alleviate poverty" approach is a bit too much like the "Let insurance companies provide for your access to health care." What are the real, and possibly hidden, costs to these approaches?
Posted by Will Corsair
|
September 15, 2009 1:22 PM
Posted on September 15, 2009 13:22
To frame the issue in another way, "What are the potential unintended consequences of these kinds of efforts?"
Posted by Will Corsair
|
September 15, 2009 1:27 PM
Posted on September 15, 2009 13:27