Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« GOP Shrinkage... | Main | We need more Carla Rangers! »


Big Churches May Have Something to Think About

By Gerald Britt
May 20, 2009

"...we have many political opportunities to work for justice, peace, democratic process, and freedom. The fact that Jesus could not use radio and television does not mean that we should not. Similarly, the fact that his political options were fewer than ours does not mean we should not use the political process to work for structural change whenever that is possible." (Ron Sider, One-Sided Christianity)
There's a pretty interesting recent study of American 'mega-churches' conducted jointly by the Hartford Institute and the Leadership Network in Dallas, Texas. Together they researched a number of different areas regarding the character of churches whose attendance (not merely membership), numbered at or more than 2000 people. Included in the study were things as varied as the nature or character of their worship (traditional vs. contemporary, the role of small groups, probably one of the newest phenomenon - satellite campuses and the like.

What I found interesting was what the study revealed about mega-churches' how the respondents replied when asked about worship, social justice and politics.

For instance, when asked to describe their worship, in 2005 an equal number of respondents (90%), described the worship experience as 'joyful' and 'thought-provoking'. By 2008, 94% of the respondents described worship as 'joyful' while the number who described worship as 'thought-provoking' fell to 88%!

I don't know about you, but to me that's more than a little disturbing!

At the same time the number of mega-church attendees who described themselves as politically 'conservative' fell from 55% to 33%, those who described themselves as moderate or 'right in the middle' rose by 6% (11% - 17%).

Yet with all of this, only 30% took the initiative to get out the vote and only 21% provided announcements regarding opportunities for political engagement. However, 51% of the churches studied described themselves as 'working for social justice. Emphasis in these churches was placed on social service programs, while 90% declared themselves to be a 'force for good in the community'.

I don't mean to ridicule or criticize by citing this report. The mega-church is probably undergoing a sense of change and reformation with the rest of the country. Pastors with multiple services have a great deal of challenge in presenting 'thought provoking' messages hurrying to get one audience out and another in. And the socioeconomic make up of predominantly suburban mega-churches can make it very difficult to turn such audiences into an army.

All of this being understood, there is going to have to be a reckoning: a point at which maintaining numbers and technological dazzle will have to yield to a decision as to what must be done when social service becomes a poor substitute for social justice and there comes a demand for systemic change.

I heard that, going in to the presidential race that just concluded, there was a group that wanted Martin Sheen, who played President Jed Bartlett on 'The West Wing', to run for the nation's highest office. Sheen said of his would be supporters, "They've confused celebrity with significance."

Our world doesn't necessarily have to have big celebrated churches. It does need churches that are determined to be significant, whether they are big or not. That will require a great deal of prayer - and thoughtfulness...


Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on May 20, 2009 12:58 AM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "GOP Shrinkage..."

The post that follows this one is titled "We need more Carla Rangers!"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.