I'm sitting on my couch, reading this article in USA Today and my head is beginning to hurt. My brow is furrowed and I can't seem to make my face relax. I'm confused...befuddled...frustrated.
But as I began to write and think about..."How can a super-power country made up of wealthy people who gained their wealth and power by their intelligence not see the need for investing long-term in the education of our children????" it became a little clearer to me that my question was all wrong.
In one sense, the people at the "top" are intelligent. Many of them, I'm sure, have big name degrees and important titles. But, it is also many of those same intelligent people who are manipulative, greedy, and have created our demise. When they are inwardly focused, it's no wonder that they don't care what happens to the rest of our system and our children and the educated people of our future. From my point of view, it is a very self-serving set-up.
I know at this point, there seems to be no other way but to keep bailing people at the top out, hoping everything doesn't crash and burn. But I just can't see the rationale in continuing to provide funding (and bonuses!) to people who have created the failing system and, at the same time, require cutbacks from our schools.
Take to heart this information, pulled from Larry James:
Last Friday morning Dallas Mayor Tom Leppert shared a horrifying statistical profile about our public schools and male students. Consider 100 boys in public schools. . .Is that really how we want our country to move forward??
- 32 will end up in prison. . .
- 44 will graduate. . .
- Of those who graduate, only 4 will read at grade 12 levels and only 1 will be able to do grade level mathematics.
However, it is the people who are affected by those statistics who I tend to believe might have the answers--people who have dealt with little for so long tend to have answers many of us have never thought about. They have innovation and creativity when it comes to making ends meet. They understand what happens when a system doesn't educate children adequately. Perhaps if we invested billions on the other end of our spectrum... the education of our public school children...the investment of technology in our low-income areas... offering unique opportunities to those who have not been given the chance to discover new interests... we might discover answers and solutions people who never had to struggle could never imagine.
I tend to believe that the answers might come from the poorest of our great society. People who have dealt with little for so long tend to have answers many of us have never thought about. They have innovation and creativity when it comes to making ends meet. Perhaps if we invested billions on the other end of our spectrum... the education of our public school children... the investment of technology in our low-income areas... offering unique opportunities to those who have not been given the chance to discover new interests... we might discover answers and solutions people who never had to struggle could never imagine.














Comments (1)
These are great insights. My own tenure as a public school teacher at the heart of the Bush years taught me how those in charge at the time saw students like stock portfolios. They asked questions like:
How can we invest in the kids who will give us the greatest returns over the shortest period of time?
Why should we take unnecessary risks? is there economic value to teaching kids to think for themselves?
If a student fails, the teacher is to blame. If he or she succeeds, it was because we raised standards and expected more - not necessarily because we gave more funding or provided incentives for innovation in the classroom.
Keep pushing! The answers are out there. Oh, and put down the USA Today..=) Not worth the read.
Posted by Michael Fedor
|
March 24, 2009 5:22 PM
Posted on March 24, 2009 17:22