As I talked with a friend, I could hear Anderson Cooper speaking from the CNN news room in the background. But it was the glimpse of the rioting being shown that caught my attention. As I watched closer, I realized that the rioting was in response to a video that I had seen a few days ago.
As the CNN news report showed people jumped on police cars, the reporter talked about the rioting being "senseless and all caught on camera." Perhaps it was just a poor choice of words on the reporter's part. But "senseless" rioting? Really??
I just finished reading a book called Blaming the Victim. It was written in 1971. As I read the book, I was compelled to write several times in the margin, "same as in 2008." I thought about the book as I watched the video above and listened to the CNN reporter.
One chapter of the book is entitled "Counting Black Bodies" and talks about the response to the riots in the 60s. One of the quotes in the book seems particularly relevant and applicable to this very situation.
"...almost every disturbance is initiated by police action that the community finds offensive and intolerable."However, it's interesting to me that the book also surmises that, despite the police fatal brutality toward people of color,
"the predominant focus of violence by residents is against property, rather than persons..."Unfortunately, police violence is against people rather than property.
The CNN reporter called the rioting "senseless." Allow me to refer to the 1971 book again...
"A white surburbanite finds this [rioting] hard to comprehend; he might find it easier if, once or twice a year, a teenage son of one of his white neighbors were found dead on the tree-lined street with a police .38 bullet in his back."From what I've heard from reports, the young man was being arrested for fighting on the train. Arresting him may have been an appropriate consequence for his actions. Killing him was not.
I've also heard that the officer may have meant to reach for his tazer (though the video doesn't seem to show a lot of struggle from the young man... and the man was unarmed). Post-incident, the officer is refusing to be investigated and has resigned from the force. Perhaps that officer recognizes he made a fatal mistake that affected a young man's life as well as an entire family. Giving the officer the benefit of the doubt, let's say he's a nice and good person. However, being a nice and good person is not enough.
The reality is that in 2009 we still allow our fears to be attributed to an entire group/race of people instead of channeling our fears toward certain individuals. As a result, one [more] unarmed young black man is dead.
Blaming the Victim was written in 1971. This is 2009, yet sometimes I wonder just what it is that we've learned over the last 38 years. Though I know in some ways we've made progress, there are so many ways we haven't. Watch the video. Read the book
. Then talk to me about progress.














Comments (2)
Wow! I saw another video of it that was even more disturbing. It was clear that the victim was down on the sidewalk and you could clearly see the officer open his holster, get the gun and "subdue" the man with a shot to his back. The guy wasn't still before being shot, but no one was in terrible danger.
I can understand a vicious response I guess, but I have never quite understood the ruining of one's own neighborhood. After the LA riots people could not even get groceries. On the other hand, perhaps "acting out" against anything but what is your own is met so harshly here in America...for people of color, that it is all they dare do.
I would like to see a trickle down effect with a black president where you BETTER NOT get caught acting racist as an officer. On another note, I have to wonder if the officer was a recent soldier, perhaps suffering PTSD. If he was, I hope it comes out and I hope he gets treatment even and perhaps especially if he goes to jail. [I think he will.]
Posted by Jean
|
January 9, 2009 11:58 PM
Posted on January 9, 2009 23:58
I have never understood ruining one's own neighborhood either, but it makes a whole lot more sense when you think that the property they are destroying is property of the people who have perpetuated the violence and injustice in their neighborhood. In the book, Blaming the Victim, it talks about the riots and talks about how the store owners who weren't good to the community were targeted and the ones who were were left alone. In the CNN video I saw, there's a girl who explains that they always feel afraid so in doing the rioting, they are trying to make the police feel afraid of them for once. Makes sense to me.
Posted by Janet
|
January 10, 2009 4:53 PM
Posted on January 10, 2009 16:53