Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« I Miss Christmas | Main | Mankind Is No Island »


An Immodest Proposal?

By Jean Binder
December 21, 2008

I understand that in Germany, and perhaps other European countries, folks who want to get married go the equivalent of a Justice of the Peace and sooner, or later, schedule a church wedding if they so desire. The government wedding is for tax and other responsibilities and inheritance purposes. The church wedding is - well, for the Church - in its largest sense.

Now some think our one-step method is superior and perhaps even more sanctimonious if you have the whole thing done at a church. Here is my immodest proposal involving a one AND/OR a two step process that I believe would ameliorate our nation's gay vs heterosexual marriage quandary:

First, everyone who wishes to have a union recognized by the state, with rights and responsibilities in the eyes of the law, should not only have the option, but be REQUIRED to establish one - heterosexuals, homosexuals, anybody. This option should be as inclusive as possible and open to every human who is of age and not already legally entwined. Short of marrying animals and children, who, as far as we know, cannot give informed consent, and probably groups, which is asking for more trouble than our laws know how to handle, any two humans should freely establish civil unions. No questions need be asked beyond the necessary - though some required counseling might be a good thing.

Not to be denied, individual congregations should be free to perform or not perform non-civil religious ceremonies for anyone who meets and agrees to their criteria. These would be faith unions and differences about who can receive a blessing of this sort would mostly devolve to finding a faith in which one is at home and where you are welcome. If the faith rejects the union for purposes of a blessing, one need only find a place where one IS welcome, a place whose values are compatible. No talk about forcing faith institutions to provide equal services under the law... the civil union would already be in place and the rest completely a matter of mutual consent. It would be as straightforward as that.

If folks were honest, I think they'd have to admit a lot of the pushing and shoving that goes on with this issue is based on power-seeking and feelings of threatened adequacy. Gays take offense at someone withholding a ceremony, even when illegal or when to perform it would violate the faith of the blessor. Feelings of threatened adequacy rise up and there is a desire to force equality of treatment - as if churches were a mere tool of the state. Unfortunately, for their part, I feel some faith-constrained, as opposed to faith-liberated churches believe they must politically and legally deny others what they easily deny themselves, a legal homosexual relationship - extrapolating their own convictions or lack of need onto others via tenets of the state.

Right now, I think most of the states very foolishly frustrates the desires of perfectly civic-minded couples who happen to be homosexual and also wish to formalize a lifelong legal commitment. The government should embrace providing this service as part of providing services equally to all. Further, no church should have anything to say about legal relationships. If one is talking about services of the state, everyone should be entitled, period.

In short, let civil duties be handled by civil servants letting everyone be eligible for the provisions and protections of the state. Afterward. or even before, let everyone be free to have a faith ceremony with whatever faith community they identify with - or if they wish, none at all.


Comments (1)

Simone Davis Author Profile Page:

You, Gerald, Angelo, Carter, Randy, Jason and others here at EverydayCitizen have offered so much food for thought regarding the gay marriage controversy.

I think that I was much like Randy a year ago - where I thought that the whole gay marriage controversy was not really about civil rights. However, like Randy says he has, I've also had a change of heart. I now see that it matters. Since I live in California, I've had the unique experience of watching the Evangelical/Catholic fight against the gay civil rights unfold in my daily newspapers, at my local malls and in our streets. Still, I must say, that I've learned so much about the topic right here at this EverydayCitizen website.

If anybody wants to read all of the interesting posts at this site about the gay marriage issues - here's the list of all the blog posts with the tag, Gay Marriage. It's worthy of a look at the list because so many people of diverse attitudes have written such thoughtful blog posts about it.

Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on December 21, 2008 10:37 PM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "I Miss Christmas"

The post that follows this one is titled "Mankind Is No Island"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

© Copyright, 2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.