Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« Confession is Good for the Soul of the Country | Main | Mormons, Catholics, and Evangelicals Against Proposition 8 »


Pro-lifer supports choice

By Bill Shanahan
November 26, 2008

The Freedom of Choice Act was introduced in 1989 to codify Roe v. Wade. I wonder if its opponents have actually read it.

I support reproductive rights for women (and men). Since I couldn't understand the full implications of deciding about one's pregnancy, I always believed the decision was not mine to make. My conclusion was as unsatisfying to me as it was personally correct.

I am father to a beautiful 6-year-old son. The road traveled from conception to birth was wondrous for me. Holding him for the first time was truly magical. My wife required early ultrasounds. Her physical challenges allowed me to glimpse into her uterus long before I normally would have. The experience was transformative.

Seeing that heartbeat on the monitor, unbearably tiny and precious, forever altered my perception of unborn life. My faith was born out of intuition and emotion, not thought, and it was liberating.

I write as someone personally devoted to unborn life and politically committed to women's right to choose an abortion. Thus, I strongly believe Congress and President Obama should enact FOCA.

Contrary to popular propaganda, FOCA does not allow abortions right up until birth, but is designed to insure the supreme law of the land is respected. Its codification of Roe uses "fetal viability" as the standard for abortions.

Roe established a three-tier approach. Women have the right to choose an abortion before viability without undue state interference. The state can restrict abortions after viability, if exceptions are made for women's life and health. The state has "legitimate interests" in protecting women's health and "the life of the fetus that may become a child."

These rights are granted women due to their "dignity and autonomy," "personhood" and "destiny," privacy and due process, "equal citizenship stature," and their own conception of their place in society. One might disagree with their decision, but certainly not with their rights.

Propagandists like to refer to pre-viability abortions as "late-term," despite obviously being either early- or mid-term. A relatively new tool in this war against women is the gruesome misnomer, "partial-birth abortions," designed to produce righteous indignation and moral horror.

In its April 2007 Gonzalez v. Carhart decision, a Supreme Court plurality upheld the 2003 federal ban on so-called "partial-birth abortions." This egregious decision clearly demonstrates the urgent need for the FOCA, since our government is no longer protecting women.

Eighty-five percent to 90 percent of the 1.3 million abortions performed each year in the U.S. are first-trimester. The most common procedure is vacuum aspiration, where the physician vacuums the embryonic tissue.

Most second-trimester abortions use dilation and evacuation. After dilating the cervix, the doctor evacuates the uterus by pulling the fetus out with forceps, usually tearing it apart. The process might take 10 to 15 "passes" to complete.

A variation of D&E often used in late second-trimester abortions usually is called intact D&E. The fetus is extracted intact or largely intact, requiring only a few passes. Intact D&E is mislabeled "partial-birth abortion," for obvious rhetorical reasons.

Numerous "extraordinarily accomplished" and "very experienced" medical experts testified that intact D&E often is necessary to protect women's health.

Congress and the court did not ban other abortions at the exact same time, only this procedure, and provided no exemption for mothers' health or life.

We are indeed a "nation of hypocrites." For 10 years, we led a sanction regime against Iraq that killed 500,000 children, yet we rail about the sanctity of life. We wring our hands about a fetus extracted intact, but legally sanction tearing one apart before evacuation.

We kill countless civilians, labeling them "collateral damage." We allow 16,000 children a day to die from hunger-related causes because the politics of food does not impinge sufficiently on our consciousness. Still, we deny women abortions that could save their lives.

I believe the life in the uterus is an unborn child.

However, I recognize that numerous medical experts, millions of women, and a nation divided disagree about that life.

Abortion opponents militate in favor of "inalienable rights" for the unborn, but often favor no rights for "terrorists," felons or those we label "enemies." We carry out a holocaust every day against nonhuman animals that often have greater sentiency and intelligence than the unborn.

Democracy means disagreement and dissent, even hypocrisy. I agree with abortion opponents about womb-life. I agree with abortion supporters about women's rights. I oppose our wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and against "terror." I staunchly support habeas corpus. I oppose sanctions and the death penalty. I don't eat animals.

I guess I am a hypocrite, too. Happy Thanksgiving.


Comments (3)

Nora Thomason Author Profile Page:

Your thoughts probably mirror the thoughts of the majority of Americans, that is, pulled between two truths, yet, like you, most of us lean towards believing that we do not have the right to take away from women their rights to control their own bodies, at all times.

Nora Thomason Author Profile Page:

Oh I forgot to say - Good Post!

bob hooper Author Profile Page:

Bill, a clear-eyed, and I'm sure necessarily painful essay. And, yes, from all the data I've seen, most Americans agree...despite the efforts of a very vocal minority.

Many on the right are those George Lakoff would call the "strong father" camp who cling to simple solutions offered by some authority or other, and flee from inevitable complexities. Additionally, many of those folks like the idea of forcing their positions on everybody else.

As an entirely practical matter, illegalizing all abortions as some want to see is unenforceable even in a police state. Something more do'able is what many advocate: working to make abortions rare, safe, and legal -- to which I would add, "and as early as possible."


Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on November 26, 2008 4:45 PM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "Confession is Good for the Soul of the Country"

The post that follows this one is titled "Mormons, Catholics, and Evangelicals Against Proposition 8"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2009, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.