I recently read a short blurb in my hometown newspaper about a local Superfund (hazardous waste) site that finally was going to be cleaned up. On one hand, I rejoiced. No longer would the neighbors of this dangerous place have to live with contaminants in the air, water, and soil. Health problems would most likely be diminished. It took residents many years to get through the bureaucracy to reach this goal, and for that I applaud them.
Then, something else caught my eye. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has decided that the easiest and most cost-effective way to "fix" the site is to do offsite disposal. Now, when I looked on the EPA's Superfund website, it seems that the end result is a chemical landfill.
Hold the phone: We're taking it from one community's backyard, and putting it in another's? Yup, basically. Now, there are all these technical phrases in the document's about recovery of these sites I didn't understand, having to do with chemical levels and parts per millimeter or something or other, that seemed to say they take into consideration how toxically saturated the soil is to decide how close to a residential area it can go.
See, that's the thing about stuff -- hazardous or otherwise.
It doesn't just disappear. If you don't live near a landfill, it's because your trash is shipped out to a landfill near someone else's house. I recently moved from New York City, where space is at such a premium they are certainly not going to give up any to house trash. Instead, they ship it out--mostly to Pennsylvania, but also to New Jersey, Virginia, even Ohio. There are only two places even in the state of New York where NYC trash goes.
Nobody likes to see or smell trash, nor do they want to have to worry about what's leeching into the groundwater. Unfortunately, many do not get a choice about it--and it's not even their trash! Generally, waste ends up that those in poorer areas end up with the brunt of it, simply due to their lower economic leverage.
Garbage is not the only area of our lives in which this happens. Drugs, disease, war--we don't want it, but we fail to acknowledge that our actions affect others. Our need for green lawns and bottled water means that someone somewhere else baths in and drinks from dirty disease-infested rivers. Our consumption of material goods, of "needing" a new flat-screen HD tv or a Wii for our kids goes on while other kids can't even attend school.
Maybe we don't want garbage or anything else toxic in our neighborhoods, but neither does anyone else. We need to change our lifestyles and take action to make sure that everyone can live a safe and healthy life, not just those that can afford to make it disappear from their own backyards.









Comments (2)
Beth, thanks for sharing this information. I'm going to have to pay closer attention to what's going on with the EPA and superfund sites and all. Sounds to me like they will essentially broaden the exposure to toxic things rather than lessen the exposure. That's no solution!
Posted by Pam Pohly
|
June 29, 2008 12:20 AM
Posted on June 29, 2008 00:20
Beth, great post, girl. Congratulations on your recent completion of grad studies too. So glad to see you writing again. I love your writing.
Nora T.
Posted by Nora Thomason
|
June 29, 2008 2:43 PM
Posted on June 29, 2008 14:43