Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« I hope President Bush was watching | Main | My Dream »


O Lucky Man!?

By Darrell Hamlin
May 14, 2008

In politics, it is generally better to be lucky than right. As the mainstream matrix tells us daily, John McCain has been very lucky so far in the 2008 race because the life of the Democratic primary has been nasty and brutish, but not short. The Clintons are standing on Obama’s last nerve, and polls suggest that both candidate’s supporters will nurse their grudges into November. While I agree that the Democratic race has complicated the party’s general election strategy, I think McCain’s good fortune is in some ways deeper than has been discussed, yet in some ways the ferocity of the donkey fight is less of a break for him.

First, McCain could never be grateful enough that the Democratic candidate is not going to be John Edwards. In an election that promises to focus on the economy, Edwards was ready for his close-up. His appeal was always more serrated on domestic than foreign policy issues, and he had made peace with the left over his Senate vote to authorize war with Iraq. More importantly, Edwards has honed an approach to kitchen table issues that blends policy with vision, transforming micro-issues about college tuition and tax credits into challenges about what kind of a country we want, and what kind of citizens we need to be in order to get the government we crave. Voters beyond the Democratic base found him trustworthy on issues of social and economic fairness; even if they disagreed with his proposals or cringed at his vanity, few would dispute that he cared. The “Two Americas” theme is more resonant now than at any time Edwards has occupied the national stage. Absent a mega-terrorist event in October, a McCain-Edwards match-up would be over shortly after the conventions.

For that matter, McCain is lucky he won’t be up against Democrats who have foreign policy bona fides, like Joe Biden or Bill Richardson. A campaign with either one of those candidates would reveal just how vapid and warmed over McCain’s worldview is, even before we consider how to recalibrate foreign policy while engaged in two wars that form one big wormhole into the abyss.

Against Biden or Richardson the depravity of the “surge” policy that McCain is so proud of would become grotesquely obvious. The “surge” strategy was never anything more than a greasy tactic to tamp down the violence in Iraq just long enough to get through the election. The transparent cynicism behind the "surge" is win-win for the GOP: even if they lost the election, the inevitable chaos when our military eventually redeploys from a fledgling unable to govern itself could be blamed on the Democrats. As foreign policy, the “surge” is but one stench in our house, and it is the last pie Karl Rove put in the oven before he slithered off to get rich.

Everything that McCain stands on regarding the war in Iraq has cost our country unfathomable blood and treasure with relatively little to show for it. Yet if Obama cannot do more than rehash the “hundred years” quote, which is clearly out of context, he will simply look like a sneaky high school debater. And that is another stroke of phenomenal luck for Republicans. A Democratic candidate with foreign policy chops would de-pants McCain in the general election. In matters of war and peace – his strong side! – John McCain looks more and more like Humpty Dumpty, and in a race against Biden or Richardson he would wobble off the wall before anyone even had to push.

But every coin has a flip side, and those who study exit polls like animal entrails have yet to turn the primary over and see what else it means. That’s what I want to talk about next.


Comments (1)

Nora Thomason Author Profile Page:

This is a great analysis of the Democratic candidates and their strengths. I particularly appreciate your nod to John Edwards, as he was my favorite - and, I agree that his understanding of our economy was solid. I liked your explanation of Edwards, "Edwards has honed an approach to kitchen table issues that blends policy with vision, transforming micro-issues about college tuition and tax credits into challenges about what kind of a country we want, and what kind of citizens we need to be in order to get the government we crave."

It's true!

Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on May 14, 2008 11:58 PM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "I hope President Bush was watching"

The post that follows this one is titled "My Dream"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.