Few would argue that anything other than the economy will be the most important issue to voters in the 2008 presidential election. That’s politics, and it relates most powerfully to individual dissatisfaction and crisis. Yet as citizens, caring for the whole, nothing is more important than the reality that our military is under fire in a war that our own government initiated and cannot seem to win. Citizens in a democracy have no greater responsibility than to make sense of their nation’s wars.
Whether the Bush Administration deliberately lied to the American public or simply misinterpreted the available intelligence, the case for war with Iraq was clearly misrepresented. It was misrepresented in terms of the nature of imminent danger and in terms of Saddam Hussein’s responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. Every government has a duty to the security of the people. In a democracy, that duty must be exercised in the context of a public debate that is as open and vigorous as possible. When government abuses the trust of the people and misappropriates vital information, then democratic life itself is in danger.
While I cannot speak with certainty about the deeper motivations of the officials responsible, the facts as they have come to us in the past five years demonstrate that the Bush Administration has approached the question of war with duplicity, enabled corrupt and unaccountable private operations in the theater of that war, and sent the military into harm’s way without the resources necessary for their safety or a strategy for their exit. American foreign policy has been rendered immeasurably complex and dangerous because of this government’s refusal to level with the American people. This war, and the political manipulations at its core, are a powerful example of why no government can shroud the policy of war from citizens in a democracy without causing more harm to democratic life than any terrorist can accomplish with any attack.
Whatever happens in Iraq will involve continued U.S. involvement on some level and continued violence. All we can do now is get the American people the truth about the costs of the war, including the reality that the potential costs down the road may be even greater if we do not handle our disengagement with the appropriate balance of diplomatic and military strategy. We got ourselves stuck in something horrible, and we will not get unstuck easily or without danger and loss. Colin Powell’s “Pottery Barn Rule” was apt: You Break It, You Bought It. That’s where we are at right now.










Comments (3)
Welcome to Everyday Citizen, Darrell. Good post!
Posted by Pam Pohly
|
May 12, 2008 5:30 PM
Posted on May 12, 2008 17:30
This is a good blog post. You must be new! So welcome from me too! Glad you are here.
Nora T.
Posted by Nora Thomason
|
May 12, 2008 7:54 PM
Posted on May 12, 2008 19:54
I third the motion: good post. Although we don't know for certain why the government launched this war, the justifications they've offered haven't been good (or even consistent). Three things, at least, seem certain. First, either the government doesn't know why they invaded Iraq or they don't want to tell us. Second, (as predicted by most experts) the war has been a catastrophe for all concerned - except Iran and perhaps Al Queda. Third, although getting out of the war is going to be a huge problem, there is no indication that waiting to get out of it will make the problem smaller.
I think, by the way, that voters will be unwise if they consider the economy and the war as separate issues. There is much hype about globalization, but also some truth. One of the truths is that domestic economy and foreign policy are no longer separate issues.
Posted by Peter Tramel
|
May 12, 2008 11:49 PM
Posted on May 12, 2008 23:49