I cannot let this go by, the old-style Washington politics, if we're going to scare you in the voting booth. - Republican presidential nominee George W. Bush, October 2000
This is what passes for leadership in Washington — phony ideas, calculated to win elections instead of actually solving problems. - Senator Barack Obama, May 2008
I adore my grandmother. She has been my friend, teacher and mentor my entire life. Sometimes her wisdom gets caught in strange phrases - this isn't new, it's just her way of talking. A couple months ago, Juliette made the following observation: Barack Obama is a newer version of George W. Bush.
That was tough to swallow. I laughed and pretended to agree, but she sensed that I was patronizing her, so she explained her reasoning:
"When Mr. Bush ran for president, he claimed to be young and full of ideas. And his major selling point was that he was a 'Washington outsider.' This election, Mr. Obama is saying the same thing, and if he called me, I'd tell him this: our country cannot afford another inexperienced person in the White House."That's the problem here...
Mrs. Clinton has a few flaws (ok, maybe a ton of flaws), and in order to win in November, she would need the support moderate republicans and independent voters. Neither support her now. Mr. Obama has a bigger problem. He needs to convince approximately 40 percent of registered Democrats that he has the ability to be president. That means rolling up his sleeves, dropping the hopeful prose, and talking frankly.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: either Democrat could be McCain. His negatives are huge, but remain under the radar. But both Democrats would be wise to tear a page out of McCain's political play book and do some "straight talking."














Comments (3)
Straight talking about issues has always been more attractive to me than oratorical inspiration. I prefer the latter in church and the former in government.
Posted by Nora Thomason
|
May 5, 2008 8:38 PM
Posted on May 5, 2008 20:38
Straight-talking is Obama's biggest asset. Senator McCain has flip-flopped and stretched the truth on so many occasions, as has Hillary unfortunately, that we Democrats dispute Obama's sincerity at our peril.
He has campaigned superbly and well under circumstances that would be overwhelming to almost anybody else. He has none-the-less remained unflappable and answers questions intelligently, calmly, clearly and with good
will.
As for the argument that we need experience. I have heard that many times from Hillary's supporters, but fail to see the logic behind it. If it is experience we are looking for, McCain's our man. Not.
To imply experience to Senator Clinton seems odd to me. She has four years of elected experience and has been "for" many good causes, but actually legislated none of them. She allows people to think that she did. She had 8 years of "being there' if you will, but her participation is highly disputed. The dignitaries she met are almost universally dead, retired, or deposed. That is the truth and where's the advantage?
Obama has the advantage of viewing history through the lens of a degree in International Relations. He had an anthropologist mother who who provided 'quality time' experiences in other cultures. He has over a decade of elected experience. I believe the right kind of experience is what counts...especially the kind that does not move too quickly to nuclear "solutions."
Posted by Jean Binder
|
May 6, 2008 1:46 AM
Posted on May 6, 2008 01:46
I agree with Jean!
I had to continue reading your post because I can't believe someone thinks Barack is comparable to Bush!! Hillary's ads, fearmongering language, gas tax ploy...all remind me of Bush...so much so it frightens me to think she might have a chance at the nomination. People are starting to point it out (finally!!). Barack said it on Meet the Press. Jon Stewart talked about it on last night's Daily Show. I want the democratic party to remain strong but we need to open our eyes and point out the obvious!
Barack is attempting to speak straight...except when he keeps getting sidetracked by flag pin questions, how-connected-are-you-to-your-pastor-and-when-will-you-disown-him questions, suggestions that he is an underground Muslim, and so much more that takes him away from talking about the issues that are truly related to being a president. Let's challenge him...and allow him to talk to us about the economy, immigration, the war, and let's see what he has to say. Can we do that???
Posted by Janet
|
May 6, 2008 9:34 AM
Posted on May 6, 2008 09:34