Democratic candidates are finally talking about faith and politics. As a seminary educated, active member of my faith community, I'm excited that "my candidates" have finally gotten around to figuring out that religion in the U.S. is not politically synonymous with the Religious Right. The Compassion Forum took place last night at Messiah College and aired on CNN. The forum was developed as a way to invite all the candidates, McCain was unable to attend, to discuss "moral issues that bridge ideological divides."
I guess I should have recognized from the start that some of the issues I care most deeply about were not ones that bridge the ideological divide. In fact, I'm left wondering how moral issues can bridge a divide. It is really our approach, our response to moral issues that either divide us or unite us. In this case, if the new approach to being a "value voter" means I have to leave behind reproductive rights, education and access and equal rights for LGBT persons, I'm once again not in the "moral values" voter block. Seems my commitment to justice for all, keeps getting me kicked out of the politically defined "value voter" category . . . or is it the "compassionate voter."
I care deeply about how the candidates in this presidential election are going to address environmental, economic, and healthcare issues. But I am not willing to let a push to unite around these issues, silence the need to advocate for reproductive and sexual justice. Poor women are disproportionately affected by lack of reproductive health services and education, not to mention the issues of environmental toxins in poor communities and lack of access to environmentally friendly food products. Don't tell me that the environment, healthcare and economics has nothing to do with pregnancy, abortion, or overall reproductive health. It has everything to do with it. CNN, who aired the Compassion Forum, which mentioned nothing about LGBT persons, just ran a story on how gay couples face higher tax bills. Marriage equality is an economic issues as well as a compassion issue.
I am frustrated at the way faith communities are painted in the media as a whole. But I am increasingly frustrated with the way we continue to paint each other. I, too, am supportive of progressive Evangelical groups who are speaking out on environmental and economic issues, as well as torture and violence related to war. These are incredibly important issues. BUT, they are interconnected with reproductive and sexual discrimination. And a view that understands compassion as its driving moral force should see that.
The current stress on a the Evangelical shift from a conservative base only concerned with abortion and homosexuality, suggests that people if they openly care about poverty and the environment, can continue to hold sexist, homophobic, and racist values when it comes to reproductive and sexual justice issues.
Justice is justice! It can't be segmented into causes.










Comments (10)
Kate,
I could feel the passion in your words! And, some of them bear repeating:
You are so right. I'm so glad that you wrote this blog post. The elephant in the room is that some may harbor the incorrect and unjust view that compassion for "unsinful" people is OK but certain "sinful" people who may have caused their own woes with their "sins" are less deserving of compassion.
You summed it up best with:
I'm so glad you wrote this!
Posted by Pam Pohly
|
April 14, 2008 5:34 PM
Posted on April 14, 2008 17:34
PS. I took the quotation marks out of your title only cuz they cause some sort of thing to go bonkers whenever there's quotes in a title...
Posted by Pam Pohly
|
April 14, 2008 5:36 PM
Posted on April 14, 2008 17:36
Great post, Kate Ott! Everything you said needed to be said just the way you said it! And, probably it will need to be said again, and again.
Bravo!
Nora T.
Posted by Nora Thomason
|
April 14, 2008 5:41 PM
Posted on April 14, 2008 17:41
Kate, speaking of the Compassion Forum, I was shocked to discover that David Brody (far right commentator at Christian Broadcasting Network) actually admitted that the Democratic Party is the big winner because:
At least we've not only found our place at the faith table, but we are seemingly the most dependable group there. We do deserve some pats on the back for that, at least.
Still, though, I'm 100% with you that gender equality cannot be thrown under the bus.
Whether or not readers here are Clinton supporters, it should be crystal clear to us that she has been subjected to venomous sexism. That same sexism permeates our society - and, as you point out - poorer women suffer the most for it.
Phenomenal post, Kate. We are fortunate to have you as a part of our community here!
Simone
Posted by Simone Davis
|
April 14, 2008 5:55 PM
Posted on April 14, 2008 17:55
I totally agree with you! (Great post btw)
I feel like there is little avenue for people of faith to enact meaningful political change through their issue of choice that specifically deals with these issues in a faith based way.
I'm at a loss - but I think the most important thing is to have a dialogue with people... I wish we could start a series of round table discussions where progressives of faith can communicate with church leaders, church goers, youth groups, whatever and talk about what issues are most important and then what we can do to influence those issues. That way we can get outside the issues like gay marriage and abortion and enact a citizen force of faithful people who are determined to start recycling drives, or food pantries, or baby-sitting centers for single moms... all at churches who are also invested...
what state do you live in? Perhaps we need to organize together!!
Posted by Ally Klimkoski
|
April 14, 2008 6:52 PM
Posted on April 14, 2008 18:52
Ally, Kate works in Connecticut at Religious Institute on Sexual Morality, Justice, and Healing. The Institute has a Declaration here that states:
Faith communities must therefore be truth seeking, courageous, and just.
More than 2,600 religious leaders from more than 40 religious traditions have endorsed it. Read the full text here.
Very cool. Kate, you are cool.
Posted by Pam Pohly
|
April 14, 2008 7:16 PM
Posted on April 14, 2008 19:16
Ally & Kate, I think you both agree with each other. YOu both see the inter-relatedness of these issues.
Ally, you see that since they are related issues, that once the evangelicals buy into the ideas of healthcare justice or economic justice, that - surely gender and sexual justice will follow.
Kate, you see the issues as inter-related too - but, if I hear you right, you are less willing to accept that if we separate them or tease them apart now - that we will ever be able to relate them back together again into one simple and all encompassing definition of justice.
I think you are both right! I also think that some progressive Christians are just so thankful that other Christians are starting to understand justice issues that they are afraid to scare them away or something by insisting that they buy into all aspects of justice.
Kate is right and true when she says "justice is justice." I wonder if we will ever get to the point that people see all other people as equals under justice. Who knows which way to get there?
I don't. But I will say this... I'm so glad that we are warriors and that we have each other for moral support as we march onward!
I'm going to leave this comment over at Ally's post too because I'm not sure she'll catch it here.... ;-)
Posted by Pam Pohly
|
April 14, 2008 7:28 PM
Posted on April 14, 2008 19:28
Thanks for all the responses and dialogue going on here. I do work for a group that is active in faith communities and working with clergy on reproductive rights and inclusiveness for LGBTQ persons.
As a local activist who has worked in a variety of prison related ministries and done health education in the poorest cities in Connecticut, these issues are deeply interconnected. It does take energy to keep them together as we work for justice. I don't have one way to go about it. I just try to keep every vigilant in my own reflection and work. I do turn to feminist liberation theology and womanist theology as a method for how I as a Christian woman practice justice-making in the world.
Ally, I definitely hold tight to the optimism of the "centrist" Evangelical groups' movement as a process and further movement as inevitable to include reproductive rights and sexuality issues.
I do think the Forum however mischaracterized the faith voices and the issues that progressive people of faith care about more broadly. It truly was a platform for the Evangelical middle - AND, if folks had said that and someone commented on why reproductive rights and LGBT issues would not be covered . . . I might not be writing this post.
(I'll post this on Ally's page as well).
Posted by Kate Ott
|
April 14, 2008 8:41 PM
Posted on April 14, 2008 20:41
Well, I'm glad you are writing, Kate. Whether it be about this topic or any other. We're just glad to have ya.
Posted by Pam Pohly
|
April 14, 2008 8:50 PM
Posted on April 14, 2008 20:50
Great conversation. I'm so glad you blogged it, Kate.
-Nora
Posted by Nora Thomason
|
April 14, 2008 8:56 PM
Posted on April 14, 2008 20:56