To refresh, the tactic of voter caging is defined by the wiki

"Caging is a term of art in the direct mail industry, as well as a term applied to a technique of voter suppression. A caging list is a list or database of addresses, updated after a mailing program is completed, with notations on responses received from recipients, with corrections for addresses that mail has been returned undelivered from, or forwarded onward from."

National Campaign for Fair Elections is on the front lines on this with their Caging Prohibition Act that they are encouraging the US Senate to pass.

Reform Elections links to the Raging Caging piece that Slate did that talks about why this is something we should all be fearful of and see as a threat to our democracy.

"Vote caging is an illegal trick to suppress minority voters (who tend to vote Democrat) by getting them knocked off the voter rolls if they fail to answer registered mail sent to homes they aren't living at (because they are, say, at college or at war). The Republican National Committee reportedly stopped the practice following a consent decree in a 1986 case. Google the term and you'll quickly arrive at the Wizard of Oz of caging, Greg Palast, investigative reporter and author of the wickedly funny Armed Madhouse: From Baghdad to New Orleans—Sordid Secrets and Strange Tales of a White House Gone Wild. Palast started reporting allegations of Republican vote caging for the BBC's Newsnight in 2004. He's been almost alone on the story since then."

So, lets look closer at the evidence that BoydaBloc provided us with.

Jim Ryun's Finance Reports can be found here
Here are screen caps of the disbursement (you can click the images to make them bigger):

And here are screen caps of the websites for these companies
Washington Intelligence Bureau

Southwest Caging site screencaps:

Take a look at that "what we do" page a little closer. This is what it says they do as BB correctly recounts above.

Things like this don't just disenfranchise minority voters. They disenfranchise young voters. They disenfranchise our service men and women who often times move around to different bases or they're living on base or off base. It disenfranchises people who have every right to vote and whose vote we should embrace and encourage.

But the problem is that often times young people, minorities, the poor, these are progressive votes because they want to elect someone who will help them. Take their vote away - you get more Republicans.

This is despicable and disgusting. Say whatever you want about issues, do whatever you want about raising money, but stacking the deck by taking away the rights of voters to cast a ballot is wrong and someone needs to stand up and fix this. Right, by golly NOW.