Shortcuts

Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« You and me don't need to send her anywhere | Main | Problems Facing Contemporary Evangelicalism »


Who do telephone companies really work for?

By Lucy Belnora
October 29, 2007

In August, Congress passed legislation that allowed President Bush to continue his warrantless wiretapping of American communications, much to my dismay. The only saving grace was that the bill had a six-month duration before it expired. Now, with that six-month deadline nearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee will once again take up the debate over reforms to the Foreign Intelligence Surveilance Act (FISA) at 10 a.m. on this coming Wednesday. That same committee last week approved a FISA amendment that would give retroactive immunity to communications carriers that have assisted the government's warrantless spying efforts.

Telecoms like AT&T are facing lawsuits claiming that they willingly participated in eavesdropping of U.S. citizen's communications, including phone calls, e-mails and Internet traffic, at the request of the government, without the government providing warrants, as required.

In one lawsuit, filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, AT&T is accused of allowing the National Security Agency to monitor its customers' private communications through special equipment installed in AT&T offices across the country.

Three telecommunications companies have declined to tell Congress whether they gave U.S. intelligence agencies access to Americans' phone and computer records without court orders, citing White House objections and national security.

George Bush has even forbid the telecommunication companies from telling Congress about their surveillance activities. What? Nobody in Congress even knows the full extent of the collusion between Bush and our Internet, cable and telephone companies.

The government has refused to acknowledge what assistance the telecoms provided, and has invoked the "state secrets" privilege to prevent AT&T, Verizon and Qwest from either confirming or denying their participation in the program when requested by Congress.

Not to the press and not even to the other branches of government. Bush is not revealing the extent of his spying to courts or to Congress. The Bush administration has thus far refused to disclose to Congress details of the program other than classified briefings provided to a small group of House and Senate intelligence committee members.

Essentially, Bush is flying free, spying on you and me - without any balance of power or accountability.

The final bill that Bush wants to sign is one that would legalize Bush's eavesdropping program as well as give blanket corporate immunity to the telecommunication companies that conspired with him.

Many Americans believe that the telephone and Internet companies that turned over all of their call records to Bush's administration should not be let off the hook. They were not mandated to offer Bush's spies real estate access to directly into their cables. They were not required to give away our personal information, call records and e-mails to Bush. Therefore, they should not be let off the hook.

On October 26th, Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) spoke on the Senate floor about his efforts to stop the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) reform legislation, in its current form, from being considered by the full Senate and from receiving a vote on the Senate floor:

For six years this President has used scare tactics to prevent the Congress from reining in his abuse of authority. A case and point is the current direction this body appears to be headed as we prepare to reform and extend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act....

I believe we were elected to ensure that this nation adheres to the rule of law and to stop this Administration's assault on the Constitution....

The damage that was done to our country on 9/11 was stunning. It changed the world forever....

But when you start diminishing our rights as a people, you compound that tragedy. You cannot protect America in the long run if you fail to protect our Constitution. It is that simple. Chris Dodd, U.S. Senate, Oct. 26, 2007

By granting immunity to telecommunications companies that participated in the President's terrorist surveillance program, even though such participation may have been illegal, the FISA reform bill sets a dangerous precedent by allowing companies to ignore their legal responsibilities to protect the privacy of their companies without any basis in law for doing so.

The House version of the FISA bill does not include immunity from lawsuits for the telecoms, after vociferous opposition from privacy and consumer advocates.

"Let the courts decide whether these companies, or some of them, were acting patriotically, with nobility and legally, or whether they were breaking the law." Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said.

"Why is the president of the United States trying to get the telecommunications companies off the hook for their illegal activity?" said Caroline Frederickson, director of the Washington legislative office of the American Civil Liberties Union. "He is supposed to be upholding laws, not encouraging companies to break them."

You can make your opinion about FISA known to your own senators here.


Post a comment

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on October 29, 2007 10:20 AM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "You and me don't need to send her anywhere"

The post that follows this one is titled "Problems Facing Contemporary Evangelicalism"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Democratic National Convention!

Everyday Citizen was selected by the DNC as one of just 55 blogs nationwide to be seated with delegates on the floor, and embedded with delegates during the weeklong 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver!

Read some of our coverage in the mainstream press here >>

Watch a Convention video featuring our bloggers here >>

Find out which Everyday Citizen writers went to Denver here >>

Browse the list of all of our Convention blog posts here >>

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their written works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2008, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.