Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« Shame in America | Main | 2% Draw Down? Not Nearly Enough, Senator »


The Definition of Electronic Surveillance Has Changed

By Pamela Jean
August 28, 2007

The recent changing of just a few words in a complex piece of legislation (that the majority of lawmakers didn't bother to read or understand thoroughly) now has the potential to fundamentally alter the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in huge and significant ways.

A 30-year old law, FISA was meant to protect ordinary citizens from being spied on by the President of the United States unless a warrant was obtained in court and a judge provided oversight. Now, a recent law passed by Congress eliminates that warrant requirement and eliminates the court oversight.

"You've turned the court into a spectator," said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC.org).

Even more far-reaching is the use of the term "electronic surveillance" which means something different in 2007 than it did in 1978. By redefining the meaning of "electronic surveillance," the new law narrows the types of communications that require warrants - and, thereby, indirectly gives the government the power to use intelligence collection methods far beyond wiretapping that previously required court approval. In other words, FISA regulations no longer apply to the vast electronic spying apparatus.

These brand new powers include the collection of business records, physical searches and so-called "trap and trace" operations, analyzing specific telephone calling patterns. Some have appropriately referred to this as "mining" or "rummaging" through American's lives on a hunt for some indication of possible wrongdoing.

The new legislation significantly relaxes the restrictions on how the government can conduct spying operations aimed at foreigners at the same time that it allows authorities to sweep up information about Americans.

Alberto Gonzales, the mastermind and prime supporter of warrantless surveillance, is leaving his post as attorney general. However, his departure will not change or end the warrantless wiretapping.

The bill (s 1927) that the House sent President Bush expands the president's authority to spy without court-approved warrants.

The bill empowers the U.S. attorney general, any U.S. attorney general, and the director of national intelligence to unilaterally order the surveillance, relegating judges on the FISA court to an after-the-fact review role. The bill permits surveillance without warrants on telephone calls and e-mails even when it's routed though U.S. private equipment.


(graphic courtesy of the Washington Post)

Background: In December 2005, the New York Times exposed the most significant violation of federal surveillance law in the post-Watergate era. President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to engage in domestic spying, wiretapping thousands of Americans and bypassing the legal procedures regulating this activity. This isn't about the spying, although that's a major issue in itself. This is about the Fourth Amendment protections against illegal search. Between 2005 and 2007, Congress did nothing. Then, in early 2007, a FISA court reprimanded George Bush for his activities and began closer scrutiny. And, oddly, in August 2007, Bush pushed through broader powers in the form of FISA amendments in order to "legalize" his prior illegal warrantless wiretapping.

Read more here...


Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on August 28, 2007 9:55 AM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "Shame in America"

The post that follows this one is titled "2% Draw Down? Not Nearly Enough, Senator"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.