Shortcuts

Connect with us on Facebook!
Subscribe.
[Feeds & Readers]
Follow us on Twitter!

Make us your home page!
Authors, sign in!

« Noise Complaints On Rise with Newest Industrial Wind Power Projects | Main | Sanitation Workers, MLK, Memory & Mission »


Evangelical Environmentalism

By Sophie Milam
April 4, 2007

The Supreme Court gave another boost to the cause of climate change this week when it handed down a 5 to 4 ruling against the Environmental Protection Agency. The court took issue with the agency's refusal to regard carbon dioxide emitted from vehicles as an air pollutant subject to regulation. This decision places new pressure on the administration to address global warming, adding to the momentum that has been building in recent months.

Media attention to global warming has increased considerably over the last year, thanks in large part to the success of Vice President Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth. More significantly, the outlook for congressional action on the issue improved dramatically when Democrats took control of Congress last fall: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi formed a Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming in March and has vowed to pass global warming legislation by July 4.

Despite these public demonstrations that the tide is turning on the issue of climate change, the most critical boost to the cause is one that has not commanded the headlines: the support of evangelical Christians.

Since the first Earth Day in 1970, environmentalism has evolved from social movement to social norm. Concern for the environment has become commonplace. Recycling is a daily household ritual, and one is more likely to overhear people debating the relative merits of carbon offsets than disparaging idealistic tree-huggers.

But while environmental concerns like global warming have become culturally mainstream, politically they continue to face significant challenges, particularly among Republicans for whom resistance to policy change is entrenched. According to a National Journal poll published February 3, 2007, only 13 percent of Republican members of Congress believe that global warming is the result of man-made problems. That number is actually down from 23 percent the year before. This is in sharp contrast to a study released in the same month by a panel of scientists from 113 countries expressing 90 percent certainty that human-generated greenhouse gases account for most of the global rise in temperatures over the past half-century. But with Christian conservatives now engaging in the debate over global warming, Republicans in Congress may soon be forced to sing a different tune.

Though the Christian right has long been wary of environmentalism, namely because of the movement's association with liberal Democrats, many evangelicals view stewardship of the environment as a responsibility mandated by God. Environmentalism has successfully been repackaged for evangelical audiences with the more palatable name "creation care." The issue resonates with evangelicals, as illustrated by the growing number of Christian environmental groups like the Evangelical Environmental Network and Care of Creation, which were established out of the belief that environmental problems require a response grounded in faith.

The environmental issue around which evangelicals are most organized is climate change. In February 2006, 86 evangelical leaders issued a statement backing a new coalition to fight global warming, the "Evangelical Climate Initiative." The ECI calls for federal legislation that would require reductions in carbon dioxide emissions. The National Association of Evangelicals recently affirmed its position that creation care is an important moral issue, and in January the group announced the collaboration of evangelical and scientific leaders in the effort to protect the environment, including action on climate change.

Of course not all evangelicals are united on the issue. In fact, some of the country's most high-profile evangelical leaders publicly denounced NAE's efforts on climate change. They argue that entering into the global warming controversy will shift the emphasis away from "the great moral issues of our time," i.e. abortion and gay rights. NAE refused to back down, setting up a showdown that some believe may ultimately redefine the relationship between evangelicals and the Republican party.

Regardless of whether evangelicals reach consensus on the subject of global warming, their political influence makes them a player in the climate change debate. Evangelicals overwhelmingly vote Republican, delivering more than three-quarters of their ballots to President Bush in the 2004 election. If they become as unified on environmental issues as they are on social issues, members of Congress will take notice, giving climate change legislation much-needed support from an unlikely demographic.

What are we to make of these bedfellows? Perhaps Care of Creation addresses the seeming contradiction best: "We're evangelical and we're environmental, and, yes, we think we can be both."


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Evangelical Environmentalism:

» On the Pulse of Morning from Everyday Citizen
You, created only a little lower than The angels, have crouched too long in The bruising darkness Have lain too long Facedown in ignorance, Your mouths spilling words Armed for slaughter. The Rock cries out to us today, You may stand upon me, But do no... [Read More]

Comments (1)

Jonathan Wood:

The NAE's statement about "the great moral issues of our time" implies either that environmentalism is not a moral issue or that it is a minor concern. The problem and the challenge for evangelicals - and indeed to all people who claim faith as the basis of their moral structure - is in the selection of political positions to which they apply morality. Certainly, one can make a strong case that the Bible is clearer on the need to be good stewards of creation than it is on the need to scourge gays and lesbians. But environmentalism doesn't whip the electoral base into a frenzy quite like the image of two men kissing. So here we have one theatre where political imperatives backflow into morality, guiding it rather than vice versa. Every political philosopher in the Western tradition would say this is putting the cart before the horse.

Post your own comment

(To create links here or for style, you may wish to use HTML tags in your comments)


Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the links below, you are directly helping to support this community website:

Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.


Browse the Blogs!

You are here!

This page contains only one entry posted to Everyday Citizen on April 4, 2007 12:10 AM.

The blog post previous to it is titled "Noise Complaints On Rise with Newest Industrial Wind Power Projects"

The post that follows this one is titled "Sanitation Workers, MLK, Memory & Mission"

Want to explore this site more?

Many more blog posts can be found on our Front Page or within our complete Archives.

Does a particular subject interest you?

You can easily search for blog posts under a specific topic by using our List of Categories.

Visit our friends!

Books You Might Like!

Notices & Policies

All of the Everyday Citizen authors are delighted you are here. We all hope that you come back often, leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

All of our contributing authors are credentialed by invitation only from the editor/publisher of EverydayCitizen.com. If you are visiting and are interested in writing here, please feel free to let us know.

For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. EverydayCitizen.com, The Everyday Citizen, everydaycitizens.com, and Everyday Citizen are trademarked names.

Each of the authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. Our authors also welcome and encourage readers to copy, reference or quote from the content of their blog postings, provided that the content reprints include obvious author or website attribution and/or links to their original postings, in accordance with this website's Creative Commons License.

Copyright, 2007-2011, All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by each the respective authors of each of their own individual blogs and works, and then by the editor and publisher for any otherwise unreserved and all other content. Our editor primarily reviews blogs for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual blog posts on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors.